[Franco] "The revolution of 1931 was artificial. Zamora ... promised a republic of priests and monks. But the republicans cannot make a bourgeois revolution. Their masses want a red revolution," the general said.Garzón, via his sources, renders it thus:
"In the name of liberty there was frightful license. The constitution was a unilateral affair. Half of Spain was persecuted."
[Allen] "Then no truce, no compromise is possible?"
"No. No, decidedly, no. We are fighting for Spain. They are fighting against Spain. We will go on at whatever cost."
"You will have to shoot half of Spain," I said.
He shook his head, smiled and then looking at me steadily: "I said whatever the cost."
- “Nosotros luchamos por España. Ellos luchan contra España. Estamos resueltos a seguir adelante a cualquier precio.” (Citado por Secundino Serrano en “Génesis del Conflicto: La represión de los huidos. Dentro del libro Federación Guerrillera de León-Galicia. El último Frente. Resistencia Armada Antifranquista en España 1939-1952”, de José Arostegui y Jorge Marco (Eds). Editorial Catarata, 2008.)Escolar writes that from this
- Allen: “Tendrá que matar a media España”, dije.
Entonces giró la cabeza, sonrió y mirándome firmemente dijo:
- “He dicho que al precio que sea”.
Es decir –afirma Allen- que “estaba dispuesto a acabar con la mitad de los españoles si ello era necesario para pacificar el país”. (Santos Juliá. Víctimas de la Guerra Civil, Madrid, Temas de Hoy. 1999. Página 25.)
it is clear that the translation quoted by Garzón is pretty reasonable. Like all translations, it is open to nuance. You can argue about whether ... "You will have to shoot half of Spain" would [have been more accurate than] "kill half of Spain." But I don't think that that changes the meaning of the sentences much.However, by pointing out a minor error Escolar distracts our attention from three important distortions, the second of which confirms the Falange's claims of mistranslation and the first and third of which suggest a straightforward intention to mislead.
First, in the original Allen's "You will have to shoot half of Spain" is clearly a hyperbolic response to Franco's hyperbolic "Half of Spain was persecuted." The entire fragment is an exchange about reciprocal justice, but the omission in Garzón document of Franco's original absurdity makes it appear that Allen is accusing Franco of violent unilateralism. The difference is between that of the rational albeit loathsome concept of an eye for an eye and the bloody irrationality of Cain.
Second, as Jose M Guardia points out, in the original text Franco's initial reaction to being asked the question is to shake his head. There are perfectly adequate Spanish translations of head-shaking available, but we are told incorrectly in Spanish that "he turned his head." Shaking one's head can indicate a wide variety of reactions, including sorrow and denial, but they are precluded by the mistranslation, thus reinforcing the Cainite thesis.
Third, nowhere in his piece does "Allen state that Franco was prepared to finish off half of the Spanish if that were to be necessary to pacify the country." In fact I think he's engaging in the classic political strategy of neither ruling out massacres nor ruling them in. For comparison, here complaining of massive injustice in another potentially massively fratricidal situation is Malcolm X:
We have formed an organization known as the Organization of Afro-American Unity which has the same aim and objective to fight whoever gets in our way, to bring about the complete independence of people of African descent here in the Western Hemisphere, and first here in the United States, and bring about the freedom of these people by any means necessary. That's our motto. We want freedom by any means necessary. We want justice by any means necessary. We want equality by any means necessary.You may suspect the worst, but there's nothing in there that will hang him in a decent court.
If the misrepresentation of evidence in this morsel of Garzón's case is anything to go by, then God help him, and maybe it's time to reëxamine some of his previous work--the mass detention and alleged torture of Catalan nationalists to prevent disruptions to the 1992 Olympics seems to be springing to minds with which, like the Falange, I have little else in common.